WORST
WEEKEND OF 2011
3.13 am on Monday
morning after the worst weekend of 2011. Isn't Spring
a wonderful time of the year? A
couple of lessons have been learned - and you never know
so much that you can't learn.
Lesson
1: Striking
yourself in the leg with an angle grinder turning at 10000
rpm tends to get your attention very quickly. This is
not a good thing to do. It also tends to get spouses very
upset when the blood and the swearing starts. People at
the emergency section of your local hospital will tell
you they see this every weekend. Only a few every year
are fatal.
Surprisingly
there is actually very little pain when you first try
to cut your leg off. It is only after a few minutes that
the pain really begins. Copious quantities of Ibuprofen
doesn't really help. This is not a recommended procedure.
Lesson
2: No matter
how consistent for however long, no method is immune from
loss and winning expectations are very hard to rationalise
when they're not met. Let me illustrate. Our OutRater
method has performed very very well this year. In fact
it is one of the very few that we have continued on with
after our official "test period" and use alongside
new ideas and approaches that we are testing all the time
and have done for many years.
Week after week
our expectation - based on a lengthy test period of 1000
bets - had been that on an average Saturday, spread over
all five States, we could rationally expect between 8
and 13 winners and a total of about 20 - 25+ place getters.
It's just what happened. Those are the long term expectations
we held so Saturday was a real eye opener. On this method
we have been betting both for a win and a place at level
stakes which tended to ameliorate any long run of outs
on the win side of the ledger.
This approach
was also foiled on the weekend. If I had to listen to
one more commentator say those immortal words "and
officially fourth was......" I think I would have
turned it up and made my own way to the crematorium and
saved them the transport costs.
So that was
Saturday and Sunday was no better. So what changed with
the intricacies of the "formula"? Nothing. What
was I doing wrong? Nothing. What was I forgetting? Nothing.
It just "was".
Good old Tiger
Woods was asked just before the PGA Championship last
month how he thought he'd go and he simply said he expected
to win. As he'd played in one tournament since April,
it rather interested me that his winning expectation would
still be so high. Then again, knowing the success this
guy has had, it shouldn't really have surprised me at
all. How far in front over his golfing career do you think
he is in regard to his expenses vs his winnings? So what
if he didn't win the PGA? What minute percentage change
was there to his overall bottom line?
The gambling
expectations I hold are that at the end of the year I
will have more in my punting bank than I had on January
1 and for the last several years this has proven to be
true so while Saturday was an unmitigated mess, the long
term plan is still well and truly on track and panic never
entered the equation. (Another good reason to put
all your bets on in advance and then go and do something
else - like meet new people at the emergency section of
your local hospital)
At the height
of Saturday's doom and gloom I got an email from a guy
in Elizabeth over the moon because he'd been using our
older Counters method and had just saluted with Just Sybil
at nearly 50/1. Life's a marvellous thing isn't it?
The way to success
at punting, really, is quite simple. Consistency. Patience.
Long term goals. As we've written on this site many times
before, there are no worthwhile short term goals in gambling
that you should aspire to because very few are attainable
unless blessed with an unsustainable run of good luck.
Luck, of course, comes and goes. Knowledge stays forever.
Running more
than one approach tends to also counter days like the
weekend just passed when nothing seems to go right and
against all historical data but, in a lot of cases, it's
hard enough to focus on one idea completely, let alone
multiples. One guy that writes quite often runs up to
11 selection methods at a time through a complicated set
up on his computer. I couldn't do that. Three or four
pull me up.
Hopefully, the
worst weekend's result for 2011 is now behind us but of
course there are no guarantees. Short term variances of
"the norm" happen all the time in gambling.
The long term percentages really vary only marginally.
It's how casinos survive. Long term percentages.
The very hardest
question for the average punter like me is what do you
do if this "worst run of outs" scenario occurs
at the beginning of a betting sequence when you're trying
your damnedest to establish a long term bank? Well it
has happened to me on quite a few occasions. I generally
give each methodology up to three "starts" at
establishing a long term bank before I discard them. If
they don't click for me after three they're never going
to and I lose interest. And by the way, I don't bet very
big to achieve the results I do. Read "Greedy
Gambling" also on this site. When I start looking
at new methodology I generally establish a notional "bank"
of $250. If I run that up to around $500 I will then commit
to a test bank of $1000 and see where we go from there.
You generally
don't win or lose in a straight line. It mostly occurs
in a series of plus or minus curves within a (mostly)
consistent distribution pattern that will trend either
up or down over a longer period. Riding out the down curves
without panicking is the key to the whole shebang and
the key that most people fail to find.
So the weekend
could have been worse. It wasn't. My 2011 long term bank
is going okay. I still have two legs. And a sense of humour.
